Acid generation potential
Henna Punkkinen1, Teemu Karlsson2, Markku Juvankoski1, Tommi Kaartinen1, Jutta Laine-Ylijoki1, Elina Merta1, Ulla-Maija Mroueh1, Jarno Mäkinen1, Emma Niemeläinen1 & Margareta Wahlström1, 1VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT, FINLAND; 2Geological Survey of Finland, P.O. BOX 1237, FI-70211 Kuopio, FINLAND, e-mail: teemu.karlsson(at)gtk.fi
- Static tests
- Acid-base accounting (ABA)
- Acid addition on the basis of the carbonate content (a recommended method within Europe)
- Standard ABA “Sobek”
- Modified ABA “modified Sobek”
- Peroxide siderite correction for Sobek ABA method
- Mineralogical calculation of AP and NP
- Net acid generation (NAG), including net acid production potential (NAPP), single addition NAG, sequential NAG and kinetic NAG
- pH-static methods
- BCRI
- Lapakko method
- Acid neutralisation capacity (ANC)
- Acid buffering characteristic curve (ABCC)
- Paste pH, neutralising potential or acid neutralising capacity, total inorganic carbon (TIC) (carbonate carbon)
- Acid-base accounting (ABA)
- NP calculated based on carbonate content (“carbonate NP”)
- Sulphur analysis (see Chemical composition)
- Chromium reducible sulphur, total actual acidity (TAA), total potential acidity (TPA)
The results from static tests are used for the estimation of the need for kinetic procedures. Kinetic tests include a group of leaching tests that can be performed in either laboratory or field-conditions (Technical Committee CEN/TC 292 2012). In comparison to static tests, kinetic tests give more elaborated information on acid generation behaviour of mine wastes (Technical Committee CEN/TR 16363 2012). Kinetic tests are performed for mine waste samples that are characterised as potentially acid generating or whose acid production potential is uncertain according to static tests. (European Commission 2009)
The duration of kinetic tests can be measured in months or even in years. However, it is yet faster to observe the effects of weathering based on these tests than in the natural environment (Lapakko 2002). The most commonly used laboratory scale kinetic test methods include humidity cell testing, column leach testing and lysimeter studies. All test procedures follow two alternate stages; samples are subject to periodic leaching, after which the drainage is collected and analysed (Technical Committee CEN/TR 16363 2012).
Results from the kinetic test procedures indicate the amounts of leached substances from a waste material under the specific test circumstances (Heikkinen et al. 2008). With the help of kinetic testing it is possible to gather information on the weathering rates of the materials to form secondary minerals and the release of harmful substances into the surrounding environment. Tests simulate naturally occurring weathering reactions, and based on the results it is possible for example to estimate oxidation rates of sulphide minerals, depletion rates of carbonate minerals, duration in which acid generation will take place, and leaching rates of different metals. (Tremblay & Hogan 2001)
Methods to analyse AMD quality in long-term include (Technical Committee CEN/TC 292 2012, European Commission 2009):
- Kinetic test methods
- Humidity cell testing
- Column leach testing
- Batch experiments with dissolved oxygen
- In-field reaction and leaching tests
- Simulated rainfall leach tests
- Pilot scale tests in field conditions
- Field scale testing and lysimeters
- Drainage from waste material of similar ore types with similar ore processing (analogues)
- Geochemical modelling (see Hydrological and geochemical modelling)
References
Technical Committee CEN/TR 16363 2012. Characterization of waste – Kinetic testing for assessing acid generation potential of sulfidic waste from extractive industries. Technical Report. CEN/TR 16363:2012.
Tremblay, G.A. & Hogan, C.M. (Eds.) 2001. MEND Manual, Volume 3 – Prediction. MEND 5.4.2c.
Leave A Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.